From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, goops-cleanup, created. release_1-9-4-72-gb1955b1 Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:29:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87eiocalhu.fsf@gnu.org> <87skcp6e71.fsf@gnu.org> <368BC133-C020-4554-9097-CF32496F1416@raeburn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259102988 28011 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2009 22:49:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 24 23:49:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ND4Cb-00086P-Du for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:49:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50594 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ND4Cb-00089T-6b for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:49:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ND43j-000400-FF for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:40:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ND43e-0003vE-Oi for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:40:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46021 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ND43e-0003v2-D5 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:40:26 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:38627 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ND43e-000748-0O for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:40:26 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCDFA10DA; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:40:25 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=WF6KpiT7/k+54CKKvZpW4PKnw5c=; b=wq+j19 /Eg1Sku8WiCDPvKApYnSnYbbZL/27qzNeqHdLVoRZcLStGEVqAtyPQx+izw0QbjB gMhULxynFXH7OBm6HA7eDm1jOiYT3E6MVwG6oWViUDahAHKzkrGwQZIbXTz19AaX DknJrFH+T+Z8qXXKsHob3EYR9sIoEPoj0iAKw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=h38CgRIEI/Gt71fOUZFvkQ9K1DZd1KVs Xmj3ETO5BpKGEDY4mY3x4qri+1c1UqA5VmGc7mTyreYqFMl+YR3bhekzeOh/qQwu VHDQNkjYg6tCMgX3VXj5UPiMhrCJZd5Rwk/AaPUsqbY+uqiSzHa8AQ89RQVXBnty 6iHHhhIdeKI= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A51DA10D9; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:40:24 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [83.44.190.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E081CA10D8; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:40:22 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <368BC133-C020-4554-9097-CF32496F1416@raeburn.org> (Ken Raeburn's message of "Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:05:56 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5B0A5078-D94A-11DE-BA4C-EF34BBB5EC2E-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9710 Archived-At: On Mon 23 Nov 2009 09:05, Ken Raeburn writes: > On Nov 21, 2009, at 13:22, Andy Wingo wrote: >>>> It's confusing a bit, and delightful :) See >>>> http://wingolog.org/pub/goops-inline-slots.png. >>> >>> Nice diagram! :-) >> >> Followed up by >> http://wingolog.org/archives/2009/11/09/class-redefinition-in-guile :) > > Nice description. > > But, I'm looking at it, and thinking... is that widget update done in a > thread-safe manner? There is a token nod to threadsafety with some locks in goops.c. However I would not be surprised if there were some corner cases. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/