From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: debug and backtrace Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:31:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1252670144.24639.134.camel@localhost.localdomain> <87y6oilxwx.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1253129798 8388 80.91.229.12 (16 Sep 2009 19:36:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 16 21:36:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mo0Io-00033w-MB for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:36:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45346 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mo0Io-0007nG-4y for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mo0Ii-0007mq-AU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mo0Ic-0007j9-UT for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60339 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mo0Ic-0007j6-Oo for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:62533 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mo0IW-0000no-5e; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:12 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731CB53DBB; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:11 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=AeVifUUtYTo+ iy2WAnEFzkDetn8=; b=iumtUS+nS+NbmKl7+37ppllTziz39OsbyzN9cX+Vfnsh NKGk+QDsLIM6GmbomV+R78k6YmdvUfO4kJ+7sBprJlKhUMfgWRupjcZC2RQpyM0K DUVOgc1S/HKDKWGx5wypsaizNK4PlYGm93u6+FL1KTyT9mALocxzjkeN0MLlROc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=B9R6zg SlkKUvjieMVuZzVZiooSF62n53kr/ykSaXXr6HozWTqNlsVC+kVF9VfRCgBA9wF9 97gie+QoAv3YTZO9o+s+V7wA9pEqzBDSfwGJnoqb113poYRAbb3N7pUqQZp7LF2F ivSAARaDpstRFRyP4wYM8ajsVXvQyzZlZC4Kg= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0C253DB9; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:10 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [83.32.70.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68A3C53DB3; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:36:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87y6oilxwx.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Sun, 13 Sep 2009 16:30:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2FACE5C2-A2F8-11DE-AA39-8B19076EA04E-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9327 Archived-At: Hi Mike, On Sun 13 Sep 2009 16:30, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Mike Gran writes: > >> With the default behavior of 1.9.x, REPL debug and backtrace are broken. > > Indeed, it looks like the VM frames are ignored. Hopefully by the next release, and certainly by the following one, this will be fixed: by having everything on the VM stack. So yes it sucks now, but it's because we have so many kinds of procedures and stacks that it's tough to make a nice debugging interface. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/