From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Extension search path changed in 1.9 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:16:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87d3pv3gjr.fsf@gnu.org> <8762sqtvb5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297444330 8667 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2011 17:12:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:12:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 11 18:12:04 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PnwXI-0005am-Pw for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:12:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55335 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnwXH-00086i-Na for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:11:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38557 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnwWx-00085Q-NS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:11:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnwWw-0005h8-RZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:11:39 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:50635 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnwWw-0005gz-Mo; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:11:38 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613504174; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:12:40 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=L5tjJwBCJOuo sqUu/WcghgioQl4=; b=W3iNi1/LxjKJJUYE82ix2MoDrIfPC1aLFwZ837v12Dwv P11m8PyFeX/FLXVYtAGBl/zJwqWRa/XzlFoLsuIB3Y/XHNEmi0EDKy/Ci8dBUcQJ YQtdNXogn7s8551fw+QMMelUG9rs58vZA7uUG3CgGIwNF/KkqxtGkKUrCBZYIxg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=GXRG2c +RDdBcxbiMmiw3F3aTwRIQSvlfA1/rKirmU7yP0Jq50ROiU3Smk3v95OYp9/cE0g lGGXRn4RiV8tNo6/T/giD255G+PQHzjyNk2apbpPi9ZoSa20fUFvMXfYK2wDXF5b wGLupmtE9uv1j5+KW213RF4/CvB2D9UwOwNCs= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46EA54173; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:12:39 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72A0C4172; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:12:37 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8762sqtvb5.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:01:02 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 20F00818-3602-11E0-B15B-AF401E47CF6F-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11560 Archived-At: On Fri 11 Feb 2011 17:01, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> I guess that's what we need to do with the libtools that are "out >> there". > > The libtool invocations you mean? No, the libltdls. I was thinking about getting some other API into ltdl, instead of hacking at environment variables; but hacks should be sufficient for now I guess. Cheers, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/