From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: proposal: enhance and rename guile-tools Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:27:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ipvdqt69.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300696039 17343 80.91.229.12 (21 Mar 2011 08:27:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 08:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 21 09:27:15 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1aSI-0007YU-6d for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:27:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46213 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1aSG-0005Cb-Li for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34410 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1aSA-0005B3-44 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:27:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1aS8-0005sy-D1 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:62259 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1aS8-0005sm-3P; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:27:04 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7831343CB; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:28:42 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=715318Yq3+BC 3DgtvaMP7ZgmTHk=; b=fnMFNQuvVtBMiroCEX/PybqnK7tm5vV9FTLMJFe/dkHd RD+Q4OwBT4OoztROOlIrN/UsnfBltXNc998kuO/0kv7CPa/t9xzrzTqmCyr/7O/S mBvox71gPko3OCrDpB3pW+1IPuLdh4fXAJWt/4tHOKEOtdE9fUMqlH7GdaFERfo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=YMsMtd lXjM7HAJt6M3TSYZKyKKrQom/HwW6kBxR+zeO2yK3AbznriHSizt4RvQSXhKDofN gAoFNtcFsKskQvZCi5o2kBhHlAcyqrRV3ErzmvgcjJoUpSlAuGPtpz4ImlpgmX2+ pVyrOltImJZ1WpMNfLfSfhhtoC7qd9Ei8e63w= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6509E43CA; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:28:40 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEB4C43C9; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:28:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87ipvdqt69.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:16:30 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 39A2FA40-5395-11E0-9E1D-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11937 Archived-At: On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> it has a pleasant subject-verb-object when you say it: "Guido, compile >> my-file.scm." > > Is the pun[*] intended? :-) Not really, no :) > FWIW I=E2=80=99m happy with the verbose name and I fear the joke wouldn= =E2=80=99t be to > everyone=E2=80=99s taste. I=E2=80=99d also be happy with a shorter name,= though. OK. Anyone have any other good short names? Cheers, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/