From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: r6rs libraries, round three Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:01:30 +0100 Message-ID: References: <2bc5f8210909261310q7a32ff83x8ebceb44a78d55c5@mail.gmail.com> <2bc5f8210909302132w258d3f09tf1259bdfd6b1ca9e@mail.gmail.com> <2bc5f8210910241210t11ee37a9o60f3991eb35eab55@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1256512319 7794 80.91.229.12 (25 Oct 2009 23:11:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Julian Graham Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 26 00:11:52 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N2CFb-0006lF-3t for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:11:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60973 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N2CFZ-0008KO-Qn for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:11:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N2CFW-0008Jm-Qe for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:11:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N2CFS-0008HA-9V for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:11:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60064 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N2CFS-0008Gy-22 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:11:42 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:47073 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N2CFR-0000as-Rb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:11:41 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0ACF8617F; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:11:40 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=jkj+VJqpeJ7NT/MS4RTQVTH4tR8=; b=UEBLyr oWtcuW9hRj1m8FFOKqZNWmnax897ktgO8nwExv5fR2mlauKJKvZtXAboDr2vk8rp WOe6ngUcY5msUDrjuaTs0LM4eBx5OTCgm5sXeZNzMUH5Lx/CUSUXr2y6BpWIUxAg Sp/v6ZpEeaBGsv/pFhE05i/qQ5L0UE1WcOyuE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=B2TqfnSZV5X8sVCkNCXfg+44zKVmm9A8 pCLOwbtSVWwTKDSEgk5qBvfWK2rPbLlLGbBdlaEdmMINHSIS/VJstc4SWFwX2KpS UI40ts1ia33dkCqeAHCKIMblFKuo8KIo11S+xAYgyRTOk+VNi4NT4ByTtKhq+6cJ BX3k88tfXiQ= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E76C8617E; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:11:39 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [88.0.167.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA7F58617D; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:11:37 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <2bc5f8210910241210t11ee37a9o60f3991eb35eab55@mail.gmail.com> (Julian Graham's message of "Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:10:25 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C03E9158-C1BB-11DE-AE16-A67CBBB5EC2E-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9572 Archived-At: Hi Julian, On Sat 24 Oct 2009 21:10, Julian Graham writes: > Besides version, another thing that would be very useful to have > "native" Guile support for is being able to export bindings with names > other than the ones given to them within the module It should work now, though with hacks -- if you manipulate the module-public-interface directly. But perhaps some more baked in support would be useful. > to be able to "rename" variables exported as part of the module's > public interface in `define-module', similar to what the `#:select' > keyword allows you to do for imported bindings. Would you not want programmatic renaming as well? > What do people think? Can you explain a use case a bit more? I think having trouble grasping why you would want to do this :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/