From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Benchmark tracking Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:24:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871vkoldwc.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1256686166 7719 80.91.229.12 (27 Oct 2009 23:29:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:29:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 28 00:29:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N2vTb-0006oj-Du for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:29:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37152 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N2vTa-00072F-WC for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N2vTR-0006z3-TZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:29:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N2vTN-0006wz-Do for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:29:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41726 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N2vTN-0006wq-1r for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:29:05 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:56835 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N2vTM-0007NC-N6 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929D88880B; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:29:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=4OuplxjcwxI0FLzaWaWRofI1Qto=; b=Pt+OTi Wag8NC/h0i6bBVyTuhukIAgAxBLPJkgUL+xn1MEtN7GJaUwZ0fDs0iDSTyDqi4PR huxF1YZC7oWYTNuxAxKD4WUZcSozXTM3FutnsN36QYOqQRwC3xuhUoySNd0q/ccY MCd56yQniBc8WUGgsElLqU6yiq7vdSmggOm2k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=uubRpCxNmlVShWWNb6wfeO1GQL//TyrL FOnAkLGLFVMGnObcAPVGXCzBjXgC+OPlkl46CiIaaMDBGyQe/GAZdDunr6xta847 NOgaMmYcRBWkSBd499CLJfn5UtAt3FpqOoIXJ8mEBPwIGLWNHNR+x2aKvTsGybUJ lsSDMozQdmQ= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8403488809; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:29:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [79.156.146.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BAA0A88808; Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:29:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871vkoldwc.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:34:27 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8347698C-C350-11DE-A9FD-A67CBBB5EC2E-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9588 Archived-At: On Tue 27 Oct 2009 22:34, Neil Jerram writes: > I've been running benchmarks for a while in my overnight builds, and > have put up a web page to show the results from that: > > http://ossau.homelinux.net/~neil/ Interesting! > In summary, there's nothing to be concerned about (apart from a possible > slight slowdown in the last week or so). I think callee-parsed args did slow things down a bit. Would like to figure out why, and at what exact commit. Hm, would be good to bisect this more closely. Would it be possible to map the X axis to commits? Also, we should have more of the stock Gabriel benchmarks, like in the Clinger or Feeley set. > The real point of this email is just to mention this tracking - which > I hope will help us notice if we introduce significant performance > gains or losses in the future. Great! Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/