From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: guile-devel <guile-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: alpha -> beta -> 2.0
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:35:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3hbrxdciu.fsf@pobox.com> (raw)
Hi,
I think we said at some point that we'd shoot for Guile 2.0 in December.
While it's clear that we're not ready for stability quite yet, things
are falling into place. So why don't we do this: keep on doing the
monthly alpha release thing now and in January, release a beta in
February, and then 2.0 in March.
The meaning of "beta" versus "alpha" is just marketing, to try to
prepare some buzz for 2.0.
What do yall think?
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
next reply other threads:[~2009-12-11 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-11 10:35 Andy Wingo [this message]
2009-12-11 13:29 ` alpha -> beta -> 2.0 Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3hbrxdciu.fsf@pobox.com \
--to=wingo@pobox.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).