From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: who wrote the manual? Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:06:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87tykspgcv.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286834589 13738 80.91.229.12 (11 Oct 2010 22:03:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 12 00:03:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5QSY-00048l-Gc for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:03:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57794 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5QSY-0000QQ-1o for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49199 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5QSR-0000Q9-AS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:03:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5QSL-0005KX-W7 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:02:59 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:55049 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5QSL-0005KS-TU for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:02:53 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E60CDD405; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:02:52 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=AACz4lzz5rlY0sXaEFRdTmdlLZA=; b=bKiANI npczdafJl5RLhCjrvrqrDC20xcywHQHVWJMVLou26+zyEtpTFLxQBDKAwNNff6pb XO0ZSq24Dv4oIvaoD8UxRmNU2xPU4REMndZrWcIMfowb0bJ+nWUe5pYcBs8nZ1n5 89KUTiHpFbQ0JEHuGbDEJDaX/scclSYrCNu9s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=SKBb62zDhjv1HDroTy3pZ5Zpt9IkiKSC koYpwXQArMZFd8gB/O9K6Sqt9abpuJhS6l9dsdeynMG8Fw1QRSOWeGrpl9Ru8BT0 nYVsDV+EHRrIEsxNki+Il5X1hlupaIiqfIZhzrTYW1hjQVs421zfp3rQWGENWYue ruK2wMlyBNA= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09AEADD403; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:02:51 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [79.151.216.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 547E6DD401; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:02:49 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87tykspgcv.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:30:24 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4A66E642-D583-11DF-B16E-030CEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11030 Archived-At: On Mon 11 Oct 2010 23:30, Neil Jerram writes: >> Assuming that changed lines is the real measure of committing to the >> manual > > Seriously, this is a hard question. Yeah, agreed, and agreed regarding the reorganization points; but still, the general gist is right, and reorganization is sometimes almost as much work as writing :P I know you've seen the other mail with the text. I fixed a couple typos in git but it's pretty much the same; I think I kept everyone's names in there. But if you think the tack of the text isn't right, please let me know or otherwise fix it. I think it reflects reality better, but I'm very happy to defer to you in any aspect that you choose :) Peace, A -- http://wingolog.org/