From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: bdw-gc includes in libguile.h Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:16:54 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87hbardqgw.fsf@gnu.org> <874o6ovbsa.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbangie2.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4fjf06o.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301398443 6722 80.91.229.12 (29 Mar 2011 11:34:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 29 13:33:59 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4XBN-0000Bi-Ir for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 13:33:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51631 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4XBL-00044l-O4 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41354 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4XB5-00043x-Dv for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:33:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4XB3-0002LZ-CE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:33:39 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:59399 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4XB3-0002LJ-AG; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:33:37 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EBE3A41; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:35:23 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=c0RXc+7Ez2hK 9gy33cj7qIqzCc8=; b=F438jwF374B2AQ7vV8Fqm38lTagO0Km/cJ/Z1u3GXRaJ OvrMqDa2m4NsKIBUOuQrHgMGVNuOW/EVqLK6UVX9QaFLdQvubfjNgSecvw1AtrNW 51vuaIv7+gzrIn+DqQTrBdXjGmcde/DKKk23HIH6ShgOc+l0sCFmSOmzAVfnnf8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=A2f04f maQnTk1F2Y4feNwQ1LuwfTQhtch2JIB6JHVW6hHGE6zWpLzTNRN7MGSbkJ2DuCLh /lnKbTb8G+wPOMF+WHpYwfrQgvtKWN5dd6qDT4IJ2Xe2a1Ls8pu19EvNRHgae1oZ cUz1XbOIAFebKEneld0LhJvh15wELohwARufc= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17F63A3F; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:35:21 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CDC03A3D; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:35:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87k4fjf06o.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:40:47 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A18640D6-59F8-11E0-856D-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12044 Archived-At: On Mon 28 Mar 2011 22:40, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >>> 1. Disable pthread redirects and instead register threads explicitly >>> (in =E2=80=98scm_with_guile=E2=80=99). >> >> Why is this only applicable to 2.1 ? > > I was thinking it=E2=80=99d break the ABI, but maybe not? I don't think it does break ABI. We are always free to redefine C macros, provided that binaries compiled against the old macros still work as well as they did. Given that we require threads to enter Guile with a scm_with_guile, there is no problem here, I don't think. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/