From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Test coverage of libguile Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:11:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87skd3bdw8.fsf@gnu.org> <877huf9qxh.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1256764334 4715 80.91.229.12 (28 Oct 2009 21:12:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 28 22:12:07 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N3FoK-0008Sr-6e for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:12:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44323 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N3FoJ-00070W-BC for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:12:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N3FoG-0006wG-2Q for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:12:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N3FoA-0006k4-BN for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:11:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33028 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N3FoA-0006jv-22 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:11:54 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:35817 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N3Fo2-0007Lb-DS; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:11:46 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3600C6B7A6; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:11:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=WGRIAGg4Gd1S zeC67D5oLEOXxdM=; b=nXFfgME4T+Mniu8zXhfhueTUTMGwNFolYT/tStp5gPvu ijfheEyHLw/LrELFB2Q92DzR8/hNbo9mCj6UCvwa+m7Kuctk3ywNoAFaWwloL5Ad Ks4bZqTLfgXzTcF8Yp2fXIovNNVaf05oYDcaBCQK6NGp1sEL58FyFflDsFeymxI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=tFSGKE z3U4Q5muknLC/0djXh8+XmrBybGTQujBDVhz7qLmDqNMir/VyFA1qVSubLpj2PQD +ENA/8JFaA73Do9sncWoSPhHMH9XKhm3l9ThDlSOKSGORf0lKiCV+hajfcs2FF+m Q3TjDpHMpr2m9qmlaodbRhx73jy59mkU9WcG8= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163D36B7A5; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:11:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [79.156.146.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A655E6B7A4; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:11:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <877huf9qxh.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:58:18 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7E021CEA-C406-11DE-BCC6-1B12EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9596 Archived-At: On Wed 28 Oct 2009 21:58, Neil Jerram writes: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> We really need a similar tool for Scheme code now. > > Indeed that would be good. Any idea how? The VM has hooks that can run at every VM operation. Simply tabulate the frame's procedure and the IP and you can do it. But the tracing interface needs some love -- for example, so that the hooks run with tracing off :) Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/