From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: PEG CHanges Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 23:06:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304283992 9607 80.91.229.12 (1 May 2011 21:06:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 21:06:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 01 23:06:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QGdqU-0000k4-HF for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 23:06:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40794 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QGdqU-0003Cn-0B for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 17:06:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QGdqQ-0003Cg-Uf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 17:06:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QGdqP-0006QV-QL for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 17:06:22 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:37453 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QGdqP-0006QR-Mf for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2011 17:06:21 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F1759CC; Sun, 1 May 2011 17:08:24 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=qev/BHKOhOagjdzIWBw+g18erMQ=; b=dDFehN 6tjMSBNeOxbWVgJsmDtxQNGUt5idKGkEg0hVllbseif9ltNVwi1Ndd885n3D9d1+ UxeqBmLjcCOlbPu8x5KUFAhqjbGVDjYKZoOSmb2UWdg5b7tla5R2lEktaBtUFbgf t2BwCxBj83Ije/hxSfInKx5u75GQEFq3fbM8U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=vUzP4u9MOkv4ThxrWKRAYf+u5dZz8M6L tmQOTLn3gZBXpTmhOtvTgd502TUJJsmfPc7eXyAWlBhH5zE/7cPejf7qxrFGVtwU IsiRH+SLqglGV2B6PWdPFdzd4YTOhyWMEyn1HRz0n8q2npDishjnqyq/inO6OQIj 6LxBPq8NHDc= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CD959CB; Sun, 1 May 2011 17:08:22 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE15B59C9; Sun, 1 May 2011 17:08:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Noah Lavine's message of "Sun, 1 May 2011 14:13:18 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 258EEE02-7437-11E0-8830-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12394 Archived-At: Hi, On Sun 01 May 2011 20:13, Noah Lavine writes: > Yes, I think I could do that. Great. > However, I don't think it's quite ready to merge. The last time we > talked about it, I think you wanted to change the s-expression > representation of some of the forms before we made it a public > interface. Should that be done before or after the rebase? Ah, good question. I think a clean patch set will make it easier to see what changes we want. That's just my instinct though. We can rebase again afterwards too if we want. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/