From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [Guile-commits] GNU Guile branch, string_abstraction2, updated. 823e444052817ee120d87a3575acb4f767f17475 Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:24:14 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87tz38u8jr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1243373081 17573 80.91.229.12 (26 May 2009 21:24:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 21:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 26 23:24:37 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M948O-0008TU-Tl for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 23:24:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47776 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M948O-0006MT-AS for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:24:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M948M-0006MK-5c for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:24:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M948H-0006Ls-K9 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:24:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33040 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M948H-0006Lp-Gh for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:24:25 -0400 Original-Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:36282 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M948D-0000Yr-D4; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:24:21 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2FA1A12D; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:24:20 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [83.44.191.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59A7C1A129; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:24:17 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87tz38u8jr.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Tue, 26 May 2009 00:22:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9349D42A-4A3B-11DE-9B17-B4FDD46C8AFF-02397024!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8527 Archived-At: On Tue 26 May 2009 00:22, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > However, this relies on eval-after-read semantics. That is, if the > whole file is read at once, *then* evaluated, that won't work, right? Or read at once, *then* compiled, *then* evaluated; or even, read one expression at a time, compiled one at a time, but evaluated all of a piece. A --=20 http://wingolog.org/