From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Portability fixes for win32 cross compiling Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 12:09:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100415005116.GB28615@flap> <600433.60324.qm@web37903.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20100415205822.GA6186@flap> <20100421202248.GA16263@flap> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274441855 27256 80.91.229.12 (21 May 2010 11:37:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 11:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Volker Grabsch Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 21 13:37:34 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFQXl-0005cZ-Nj for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 13:37:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51916 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFQXl-0007Vo-4z for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58390 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFQXf-0007Tj-CZ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:37:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFQXd-0001H6-Gy for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:37:27 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:54639 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFQXd-0001H2-Dr for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:37:25 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34497B5A28; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:37:25 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=zFxjaWWb0i5JdPtGNFNReehsUME=; b=HZROCL hFLXjXvpkyauqXMOyF9UqAkXyRgk1sAV3UByeI1WIsmDdphQHDeFgGC/dL1riLvH njZj8Gkvah6+NlSLgkj0UJgusw/6Ur+6X7pwqj/jtt9nLsTGLTgrEPvn6uNgWWNt i2EtbQPlp1kbsgjK9V++HsUKudzWD4/Cb5jAY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=r4KLK9T5ip4y5mfwO9lHdsJuZKcw4wV5 AHv4aovYB7FVHYQ7Q8yt4yy6tBP6P3hLb+sRGcz/SulcnizdG4FSDwTZAb/mvrnB +8Od8mm/LNCIqHMqjLdBvdexomfGbS4TMaULK51Azsj0XEInP5t4SF1iaWGor1nP lCVEtnVpkNM= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20644B5A27; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:37:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [81.39.169.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6ABF1B5A26; Fri, 21 May 2010 07:37:22 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20100421202248.GA16263@flap> (Volker Grabsch's message of "Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:22:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 398C2656-64CD-11DF-B4E3-D033EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10337 Archived-At: Hi Volker, I had your messages starred as needing attention, and was silently hoping Ludovic would deal with them. I'm sure he did the same, but in reverse ;-) Your patches look good, except for one. On Wed 21 Apr 2010 22:22, Volker Grabsch writes: > --- a/libguile/bdw-gc.h > +++ b/libguile/bdw-gc.h > @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ > > #endif > > +#define GC_NO_THREAD_REDIRECTS > + > #include Why did you do this? In the future it will make it easier for me to apply these if they follow our changelogging standards :) See any of the commits in Guile for examples of the format. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/