From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: A few errors from current Git HEAD Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:15:29 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87bp9v45gx.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <877hkhwbqy.fsf@gnu.org> <877hjla5ba.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1282320785 29229 80.91.229.12 (20 Aug 2010 16:13:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 20 18:13:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmUDF-0007kh-Lx for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 18:13:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60374 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmUDE-0006pC-Tw for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:13:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55385 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OmUD4-0006oY-Pw for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:12:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmUD3-0002iy-4x for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:12:50 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:49768 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OmUD3-0002fC-38; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:12:49 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B0FCD0FE; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:12:22 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=fOqLm9jR8tdM e7VkO2Hmknh2flc=; b=R7ZoFV58ReAS46g5e3y3Uxg9cDEDtG1ytmcMKQhr1m0f YxjAF7G9CLERwednhJpPvhZtSuq05p0a0fayKdnYFL7dYwahT/INX4SdrKyfBNLo +eg976g32z4lWE1UnxmAayBvVCpl2+b+EscsIry3nhwpx5MmgSTXZrBYAzZrsSc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=pakBu2 WQlPBUCbWNH8Aa8oSnTCBjzDcMCbalSeQYao/S/vVmg8uChi9Z7SaVbINxFsZvKK dS4cmMbTFCbxqpknHLIrLv9MdaOmqW4D5bCVTuX+ONQ3D78nYlAHaP5rwIBzdzQP jYcnAXWFJVRH73OjNQxpaltf8I491OHECIGks= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76085CD0F9; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:12:20 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [76.166.198.241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0289FCD0F0; Fri, 20 Aug 2010 12:12:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <877hjla5ba.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Fri, 20 Aug 2010 13:31:37 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B5B4CAA4-AC75-11DF-A89B-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10781 Archived-At: On Fri 20 Aug 2010 04:31, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> On Tue 27 Jul 2010 01:49, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> >>> Neil Jerram writes: >>> >>>> FAIL: net-db.test: getaddrinfo: no name >>> >>> Could you print the value of ERRCODE and also =E2=80=98(gai-strerror er= rcode)=E2=80=99 >>> in this test? >> >> I just saw this this morning, in a coffeeshop that appears to use >> OpenDNS for their DNS, which redirects not-found addresses to their own >> servers. The error (for me) appears to be that the getaddrinfo actually >> succeeded. > > Oh, yes. Should we consider such situations or just ignore them? :-) Perhaps throw 'unresolved ? Or just punt on the issue :) Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/