From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Sputnik test result Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:08:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ei8vxngp.fsf@anar.kanru.info> <87hbdqml9c.fsf@anar.kanru.info> <87aajhkooc.fsf_-_@anar.kanru.info> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296144197 14732 80.91.229.12 (27 Jan 2011 16:03:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Kan-Ru Chen Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 27 17:03:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PiUJU-0002XQ-Ke for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:03:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53810 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiUJU-0004W5-3u for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:03:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36434 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiUJQ-0004Vq-IT for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiUJP-0003ZM-BJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:03:08 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:39239 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiUJP-0003Z5-8u for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:03:07 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8C439FB; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:03:57 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=A0mcc+6ySsr2XX4yAWgsh7kI96k=; b=pjsxAx /kklRwzbePMX2dXYq5lrPClFJfIVwGTfFBqP49vNeH1X9guo/KB4jf810oRsT4i/ pasPo9ovgGzJOndfZP2vtLlK7jtNPyFMaF/yB1GTbX+WizaRbU5MTYEZV3mtfMIS ThTv0IhG+nUzo+gNFtu4i+AU4VENxZN07FTAk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=iTBFj2iHxJ9m2BnAACZSFGqos9zJhZxg UPaNnxXy8Nhr0jKw8Jm9M+cv4CUffJ5v4aLLj80v7XYT9maaHv3UHEfclgCS9/2u X937ybaUWK8Lux6oKQJAjYvt7Khe+x2NA2zdv/HWCNbqw1P5H8YEL2KPCWyekreG 1L7/Zz2EqyU= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052B239FA; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:03:56 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43B2339F4; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:03:53 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87aajhkooc.fsf_-_@anar.kanru.info> (Kan-Ru Chen's message of "Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:23:31 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0B239100-2A2F-11E0-8C10-BC4EF3E828EC-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11362 Archived-At: Hi Kan-Ru, On Tue 04 Jan 2011 10:23, Kan-Ru Chen writes: > I ran the sputniktests[1] from google using the attached guile-es-parse > script, which only tests the parser. > > === Summary === > - Ran 5246 tests > - Passed 4410 tests (84.1%) > - Failed 836 tests (15.9%) Excellent test case! I just ran the tests again, with the recent patches, and we have: === Summary === - Ran 5246 tests - Passed 4655 tests (88.7%) - Failed 591 tests (11.3%) So an improvement, but still quite a ways to go. I think the ones that were fixed are the unicode errors that you mentioned: > Where the failed tests have > > - 245 unicode errors (unicode literal is not supported) > - 393 rbrace errors (see below) > - 39 Math.LN2 errors (see below) > - 159 remain to sort out So we are left with the rest of them to sort out. Then of course to actually compile them, eh... Andy -- http://wingolog.org/