From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: Kan-Ru Chen <kanru@kanru.info>
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Sputnik test result
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:08:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3ei7ygwin.fsf@unquote.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87aajhkooc.fsf_-_@anar.kanru.info> (Kan-Ru Chen's message of "Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:23:31 +0800")
Hi Kan-Ru,
On Tue 04 Jan 2011 10:23, Kan-Ru Chen <kanru@kanru.info> writes:
> I ran the sputniktests[1] from google using the attached guile-es-parse
> script, which only tests the parser.
>
> === Summary ===
> - Ran 5246 tests
> - Passed 4410 tests (84.1%)
> - Failed 836 tests (15.9%)
Excellent test case! I just ran the tests again, with the recent
patches, and we have:
=== Summary ===
- Ran 5246 tests
- Passed 4655 tests (88.7%)
- Failed 591 tests (11.3%)
So an improvement, but still quite a ways to go. I think the ones that
were fixed are the unicode errors that you mentioned:
> Where the failed tests have
>
> - 245 unicode errors (unicode literal is not supported)
> - 393 rbrace errors (see below)
> - 39 Math.LN2 errors (see below)
> - 159 remain to sort out
So we are left with the rest of them to sort out. Then of course to
actually compile them, eh...
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-27 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-02 16:46 ECMAScript support broken? Kan-Ru Chen
2011-01-03 3:19 ` Noah Lavine
2011-01-03 7:25 ` Noah Lavine
2011-01-03 8:42 ` Kan-Ru Chen
2011-01-03 17:54 ` Noah Lavine
2011-01-04 9:23 ` Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?) Kan-Ru Chen
2011-01-11 21:38 ` Noah Lavine
2011-01-11 22:33 ` Noah Lavine
2011-01-11 22:45 ` Noah Lavine
2011-01-11 22:59 ` Noah Lavine
2011-01-11 23:04 ` Noah Lavine
2011-01-17 22:07 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-01-26 22:49 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-01-26 23:30 ` Noah Lavine
2011-01-27 16:08 ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2011-01-27 16:12 ` Sputnik test result Noah Lavine
2011-01-27 17:01 ` Kan-Ru Chen
2011-01-03 23:00 ` ECMAScript support broken? Ludovic Courtès
2011-01-04 4:10 ` Noah Lavine
2011-01-04 16:52 ` Kan-Ru Chen
2011-01-04 17:39 ` Noah Lavine
2011-01-04 17:38 ` Ludovic Courtès
2011-01-03 8:19 ` Kan-Ru Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3ei7ygwin.fsf@unquote.localdomain \
--to=wingo@pobox.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=kanru@kanru.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).