From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: 2.0.x branched! Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 00:17:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87sjvpguvj.fsf@gnu.org> <87aahtm63o.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298070776 26932 80.91.229.12 (18 Feb 2011 23:12:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 23:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 19 00:12:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PqZVL-0007B0-8J for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Feb 2011 00:12:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52274 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqZVK-0007lD-Fx for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:12:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35611 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PqZVH-0007l0-Vz for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:12:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqZVG-0005rP-P5 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:12:47 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:51689 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PqZVG-0005rE-JX; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:12:46 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB664E2F; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:13:54 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=tsTGnpzsHxlISUu3obiBCNkjY/k=; b=AqOIf8 RF2mq0cwBAKdvzIrzAPyzVoNof36nVv6eHrITHp6fCUXFyIHgwdk+e1eD9qMySlI ycQt+5LpnuUpYyDW1W4o0el+lkRzKd08PEGx4PJYCHKltBsLN59ZypUtIjfRL6Yr GZ3lDfW9CMTs22dO4N0NwxrxkCxJDwjmTf5WE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=gNW1JSygXZkuPYA0e49Aq/rd5SS/i2IU xB0M3cfZko43a/romE8x9O6l2QFubsB2tIJ1cR7lqNHW1oRsnK+0C4m9evZYxDwD ZWAG14uyv7haBlgtgfxHlNE9mNiTi706mHyAmWGhr6DXW2wHpczaN9QGgQI5SpnD 6xe7N8UwqLU= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9274E2E; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:13:52 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52D424E2D; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:13:49 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87aahtm63o.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:37:47 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BFEF245A-3BB4-11E0-942F-AF401E47CF6F-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11660 Archived-At: On Fri 18 Feb 2011 21:37, Neil Jerram writes: > Now that 2.0.0 is out, I presume the general procedure from now on > should be: > > - committing safe 2.0.x stuff (in particular, as far as I'm concerned, > docs) to the stable-2.0 branch > > - committing anything else to master > > - periodically merging from stable-2.0 to master. > > Is that right? That sounds about right to me, though I am quite ignorant in this regard. Compatible changes on 2.0.x seem fine to me; we should live in 2.0.x for a year or two I think. Tough to plan for the future, though! Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/