From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:30:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8739vocnr0.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbk3uj8c.fsf@gnu.org> <87sk3nt326.fsf@gnu.org> <87iq4gfmp8.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279571288 6738 80.91.229.12 (19 Jul 2010 20:28:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 19 22:28:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OawwW-0000rD-Jh for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 22:28:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47680 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OawwW-00021H-2M for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44711 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OawwS-00020x-1x for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:28:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OawwQ-0004c8-IV for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:27:59 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:39363 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OawwQ-0004c0-DR; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:27:58 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFACDC65E7; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:27:57 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=WSs+FQ+AOwlw 9iqPldI8jTpW/as=; b=GUgtcN6L2uSaYlxo67nY+bnnWid1duWQa6AqTpnueo0t i5D/DevG0+I+TkGdR0GqpAFeb0APTwsbqVJEx1Qh3seiGbI4tOnMMH0oVe6bCzoG TPkrsf12hr+ufnXKfDkMvaZ+dDwhFKwaGu4g/Gdl4C5RlObSBXHQe2dmHaqzcKI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=c1m8xt S/ruASbuvN0k+EAo45R1HxhI8/K8osV3e/h+SdOcRHzOBNROoXsRz+jgLT8M2i0K NPoehjXZXPY97/Ym+sZF/H5hLZcutqjwSrYFEU9wptIEVtzWfZP8gVIBrMl3H/Sb YeIvg449k9AYj01XYpUvt/mL8yOQnD7ly/cgU= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81BEC65E6; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:27:56 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [81.38.186.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12EA5C65E4; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:27:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87iq4gfmp8.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:40:35 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1DA3EBC4-9374-11DF-95B5-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10695 Archived-At: Hi :) On Thu 15 Jul 2010 23:40, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Just to make sure I understand, though: do you mean switching VMs =E2=80= =9Con > the fly=E2=80=9D (i.e., changing the VM currently executing the code), or > switching VMs statically, before booting? The latter (which is what I > had in mind) seems easy to do=E2=80=93unless I overlook something, that i= s. :-) Switching before booting would indeed be easier, and I grudgingly admit perhaps a good idea, especially for small devices (Maemo, for example). I would prefer not to enshrine a "regular / debug" split again though. I guess that's what really bothers me. It's especially egregious if you can't switch at runtime. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/