From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Can `make tags' generate tags for Scheme source, as well as C? Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:11:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87d3skxjd6.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87ocbzf4xn.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqvphb4d.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87r5g5h99i.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> <87lj64pfto.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286834878 14882 80.91.229.12 (11 Oct 2010 22:07:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 12 00:07:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5QXC-0006vC-M6 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:07:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52761 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5QXC-0000qo-1Z for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:07:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55176 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5QX2-0000le-Gu for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:07:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5QWx-0005ww-Kb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:07:44 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:58652 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5QWx-0005wr-Hx; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:07:39 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C8FDD4AE; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:07:39 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=SHo+CyCyqDLl TXbUxLAS1inC/ME=; b=dFoO09/mJd2jAuMK+gdREPBLaxpYTRMJvSqPw0+OvE+9 j8YsVQ7aleXMgq6XcActcrGHhjXW25RLu3I/jrCv+lKohDqkT+ULr5fx1R5EaBzB xXKfrQebr1TFP8h5ApmI5LtOv8DpDJYIBXN3VVDHJaGDh5luL1UKg1pgBPF2FYk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=dG3Px/ A72UfsiK7h11TB60Q40MrikSXMaKzXDVHPq665J0SqmAMlyiImvgv4NPdnN4FLSy zm0ZwxYIGPcdgEHp/T9V0sAHUG785EvEwURm7D8zv6giBBgZnfXUHkhcZe2fAkPq cS6w8l3/hoCzPEt1rF+F2peeRH8RfxIzlVR1E= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7401DD4A9; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:07:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [79.151.216.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E346DD4A6; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:07:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87lj64pfto.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:41:55 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F4C7217E-D583-11DF-AD4C-030CEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11031 Archived-At: On Mon 11 Oct 2010 23:41, Neil Jerram writes: > "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" writes: > >> On Tue, Oct 05 2010, Neil Jerram wrote: >> >>> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >>> >>>> BTW, =E2=80=98M-.=E2=80=99 in Geiser works really great >>> >>> I think I must be missing something: for me it always says "Couldn't >>> find edit location for X" in the echo area. >> >> b) for procedures in modules not yet loaded. > > I'm sorry, I think I was being a bit stupid - expecting that it would > work even before starting a REPL. Is this a bad expectation? It is the first impression. If your source code is loaded it is autocompiled and you should find the edit locations, but if they is not loaded, are the module headers enough to autoload the needed pieces? Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/