From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] First batch of numerics changes Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:50:37 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87lj2762xc.fsf@yeeloong.netris.org> <87tygv4726.fsf@yeeloong.netris.org> <87wrlo2k9z.fsf@yeeloong.netris.org> <8762t72vrc.fsf@yeeloong.netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296391078 7337 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2011 12:37:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 30 13:37:51 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PjWXN-00008I-2u for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:37:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32854 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PjWXM-0003Bv-Cx for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50144 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PjWWi-0002lU-Ry for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PjWWh-0002a9-L7 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:08 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:56836 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PjWWh-0002a5-Hp for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:07 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A9032CC; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:59 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=LimiDEtTg58vCm61GL7ly3YLoKw=; b=B1uwd+ OSxabUtPfbeH4pWQCpdSeSbpHKyvj+umLUalghEyQkpPuSc6Z5UrZhhrv6zzkexM FbYhnq3pznG25ojpUbU9UecCQ8ggaCclbl/3EFcBOF/69ky4FWabIww6/07odKZG BB54HhTVZXWzgiZE7ABYrkcg+xzBHzfclj1CU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=nmlouCXWQuL06VwJgFrWAxqAvwQon1YW 2Tq0Uo06HZcVcfxlCQNvpMoOhrHj1x1FFeCIn3PbpLlsPc/1yR2pxyMBeoKRyoDU x6n5MiAWuORbSYTTiVW9hIBnc7XIXrZO1e/p6ien7BTsSP69JmN8tCgXz4mto3fp CteOdaYp2lg= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BF932CB; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:57 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 57B5532CA; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8762t72vrc.fsf@yeeloong.netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Sat, 29 Jan 2011 17:24:55 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C46A97CC-2C6D-11E0-A3D2-BC4EF3E828EC-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11425 Archived-At: On Sat 29 Jan 2011 23:24, Mark H Weaver writes: > I forgot to ask before: what names do you think we should use for div0, > mod0, and div0-and-mod0? Taylor Campbell didn't name those. I think he considered these a mistake, and it seems the R7RS will probably agree, so perhaps we can continue to have these implemented in Scheme, in the R6RS modules. Regards, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/