From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: vm status update
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:52:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3bpukrcbq.fsf@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d4f1ea8z.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic Courtès"'s message of "Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:03:24 +0100")
Hi!
On Mon 05 Jan 2009 22:03, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I think it's good to have unit tests for the compiler/VM too.
Sure, would be good. First I'm going to work on documenting the
compiler though, so there's something to test. But honestly speaking,
I'm not going to go on a spree of unit-test writing -- I write them as I
find bugs, but not much otherwise.
So, ahem, what I mean to say is that the small number of tests reflects
the small number of bugs, or something? ;-)
>> Benchmark-wise, there's not much. I am not currently running many
>> benchmarks, fwiw -- been focusing more on correctness.
>
> Maybe "we" could start focusing on that now that the VM/compiler have
> matured a lot?
Sure, and at some point I'll switch to benchmarking and optimization --
but in the meantime perhaps someone whose named ends in udovic Courtès
could make make a benchmarking suite? ;-)) I hear you're all finished
with the BDW GC branch, right? :)
Back to the hack,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-26 17:24 vm status update Andy Wingo
2008-12-28 22:50 ` Neil Jerram
2009-01-05 16:06 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-01-05 16:45 ` Neil Jerram
2009-01-05 19:53 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-01-05 17:57 ` Andy Wingo
2009-01-05 21:03 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-01-06 9:52 ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2009-01-06 14:54 ` Ludovic Courtès
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-06 19:52 Andy Wingo
2009-03-06 22:31 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-03-08 22:40 ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-10 21:04 ` Andy Wingo
2009-02-14 22:32 Andy Wingo
2009-02-16 11:47 ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2009-03-08 11:49 ` Neil Jerram
2009-03-10 21:36 ` Andy Wingo
2009-03-12 20:49 ` Neil Jerram
2009-01-11 17:35 Andy Wingo
2009-01-13 8:05 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-09-13 15:59 Andy Wingo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3bpukrcbq.fsf@pobox.com \
--to=wingo@pobox.com \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).