From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: catch, throw, prompt, control, fluids, garbage collection Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:35:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1266532640 20627 80.91.229.12 (18 Feb 2010 22:37:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 22:37:20 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-devel Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 18 23:37:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiEzl-00019P-4R for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:37:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48008 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NiEzk-0005Xe-FH for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:37:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NiEze-0005VM-1i for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:37:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33283 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NiEzd-0005Ue-An for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:37:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiEza-000395-QP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:37:09 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:41740 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiEza-00036p-OP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:37:06 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6AD9B421 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:36:42 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Ak19lLIbX/3psl0GbpUqq38gQUM=; b=vU+aYf KH6mUUfUbRkFiSbldY3aeaimRrBGKgWPuB2a79nkvsKu/HarFmO/YDQz6+1HYNUv PY+IRO8q8etNAvt9HTLo98MVX2f7hQsKDLFGHsMowoSs018hUlswWuUinXnQ0Ta9 a+aBpXgtJmHV4bt1AsQAahV942Mg5o7nB7SyQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=xcd56mPwNedakThEBgsfP66MOWrpKCi2 gDL/MruNjMPsvv7BQcpjKWhAVBoLpz46lXfomQQo4sRA62dcLM+IfVKr+vi+l1ZR A7o9RG2FW64XpjqMBTzffDC6w0Xb8zz90B9H3SrpH60MxkpZetIIt+IQ/NxWFHOu vhYEiI2xHno= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E459B420 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:36:42 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [81.39.162.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD6C19B41D for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:36:38 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Andy Wingo's message of "Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:07:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 146C9374-1CDE-11DF-B9BC-D83AEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:9990 Archived-At: Hi, Feeling a little silly replying to myself, but... On Mon 15 Feb 2010 23:07, Andy Wingo writes: > I need an efficient with-fluids, some pieces of prompt and abort, > and to add that all to the bootstrap language of Guile, and I have > it. Efficient with-fluids: check! The implementation still causes a couple allocations, but those will be avoidable in the future as an implementation change -- if we change the wind stack to actually be stack-allocated, and not a list. So on to figuring out the prompt and abort implementations... A -- http://wingolog.org/