From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile with win32 cross compiling Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:42:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20110326220651.GA8300@flap> <20110401185020.GC13643@flap> <20110423161003.GB20479@flap> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303641764 19043 80.91.229.12 (24 Apr 2011 10:42:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org, Mike Gran To: Volker Grabsch Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 24 12:42:39 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QDwly-0005Rj-RW for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 12:42:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54702 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDwlx-0004H4-RC for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:42:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56552) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDwlv-0004Gy-9z for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:42:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDwlu-00014i-4h for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:42:35 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:37052 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QDwlu-00014c-2R; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:42:34 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF833494; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:44:34 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=kR091LSRvybUjx0hdVZhEA2LW88=; b=hquPJz 8khVFKQNNRSBF3aJKrjU4FwVXDSxY1LauCeee+ma5EKV0rIOCBeLQMo6XnSpzRlV qycW2uifzBENdltSWcAjOi7FeRd/dp9tYHscnrA+7Ord/29HmVDvfjxnggYO7w1d KXM4CqXloyu2Uqg48ib93Gg2Z6pqnO9yU+H7Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=mPSParsNxK+M3lqI1PFbQ8oaaxifk7mr GAsKuxzBtFv9QI1X93+iQe2IvszeYPsdMw2gW5/co0cQ9LzmtTGJ2gnOqiCEUtVY dLMIiub1yoUMkXM9FB0q1tFIkgiWfBd5BjHtmPpJFpMHq+5kNb9B1c3fxz5W6raG 1JSt+lec9Qg= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192753493; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:44:31 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBAF7348F; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 06:44:26 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20110423161003.GB20479@flap> (Volker Grabsch's message of "Sat, 23 Apr 2011 18:10:03 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D5D51BDE-6E5F-11E0-8E90-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5513 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12326 Archived-At: Hi Volker, On Sat 23 Apr 2011 18:10, Volker Grabsch writes: > Andy Wingo schrieb: >> Hmmm. Well. We have other code generators in Guile's build system; >> notably the configure script (via config.h and other output files). >> What do folks think about the attached patch? > > Please drop me a note when you want me to check your patch, > confirming that your work really solves the win32 cross issues. Hmm, it should have applied to stable-2.0. I can commit it if there are no objections, as there do not appear to be. It should fix the gen-scmconfig issue. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/