From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [patch] implement scm_init_guile for 1.8.8 on Solaris 10u9 Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:57:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304013469 16583 80.91.229.12 (28 Apr 2011 17:57:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andrew Gaylard Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 28 19:57:43 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QFVTD-0004Ke-G9 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:57:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54393 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFVTD-0006Ng-2m for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:57:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34435) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFVTA-0006NZ-VS for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:57:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFVT9-0000jm-Sl for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:57:40 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:34911 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QFVT9-0000jc-PH for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:57:39 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F235E54; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:59:42 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=GglGaPcRA6gy5IeBK/ArtEOCHBs=; b=xn4ddc jDYNPujAvNLKAG6nuLMarJ6O6p6HLN60fuwDO3i4lezoR2nmZ4t6Cto2ZAP0qWQ9 qZs3l1rOdmxmLBNFISW5w6cDs4D6JJja4muWV9PDCjAWHxCJ5Md29TvVnqUzbqDh wIXECHrDz/sXvExN9Wxjr3vXEwwqvpJ033jNQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=RHlgSQbuC/LMGsVejBrW8JybZaAo96y+ RHgJKDzjXITzn4xo3O9Prdpm1pCJg6FjMIXnlfJrslAlF+AdvB3ePwEGA19go1Yq ohgKJWjEBptcASowj+crixcUxhYOmGsrk3IuA9UTUs/0AA/7PdC/3irClD/fMbte 1GXS0uoKfKM= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956D75E53; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:59:40 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06CBC5E52; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:59:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Andrew Gaylard's message of "Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:40:08 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4A00BF90-71C1-11E0-9E0F-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12372 Archived-At: On Thu 28 Apr 2011 17:40, Andrew Gaylard writes: > The attached patch implements the scm_init_guile function on Solaris. > The detection of the stack parameters is done via a new(ish) Solaris > function, stack_getbounds() -- see > http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E19253-01/816-5168/stack-getbounds-3c/index.html > for details. > > Tested on Solaris 10u9, on both SPARC64 and x86_64. Thanks! Can you test also with older solaris? > PS: now, on to get 2.0.1 working... Great :-) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/