unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: array handles and non-local exits
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:27:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m38wiwn881.fsf@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ljmxsgxp.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic Courtès"'s message of "Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:08:18 +0200")

Hi,

On Thu 09 Jul 2009 22:08, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

>> To me this is a weak argument, especially given that much code probably
>> doesn't do the right thing in the presence of nonlocal exits.
>
> To me, *this* is a weak argument.  ;-)

Heh, allow me to elaborate then. "Let's keep this thing because maybe it
will be useful" is a form of cargo-culting. I am saying that it has no
use, and should be removed, *because* its presence has a cost and no
benefit. Not so much in time, but in code complexity. You can't just
write functions that return values, you have to contort code to store
temporaries and then release and then return. You have to write paired
statements. If you call a user function, you really should set up a
dynwind, which conses, and contorts your code even further.
Array_handle_release is a bad idea.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cargo_cult_programming

Regards,

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/




  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-10 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-15 20:17 array handles and non-local exits Neil Jerram
2008-09-16  7:56 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-09-17 19:32   ` Neil Jerram
2008-09-18  8:15     ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-09-18  9:17       ` Neil Jerram
2008-09-18 13:44         ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-06-30 22:59           ` Neil Jerram
2009-07-01  8:37             ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-07-01 22:04               ` Neil Jerram
2009-07-01 22:36                 ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-07-02 23:33                   ` Neil Jerram
2009-07-03 23:38                     ` Neil Jerram
2009-07-04 19:28         ` Andy Wingo
2009-07-05 11:14           ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-07-06 14:09             ` Andy Wingo
2009-07-06 20:30               ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-07-09 19:19                 ` Andy Wingo
2009-07-09 21:08                   ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-07-10 10:27                     ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2009-07-10 12:05                       ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-07-19 20:04                         ` Neil Jerram
2009-07-20  9:20                           ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-07-23 21:20                             ` Andy Wingo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m38wiwn881.fsf@pobox.com \
    --to=wingo@pobox.com \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).