From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: rfc: [build] Overhaul , cpp symbol extraction/checking. Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:43:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <874oh1g0sb.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276860080 4885 80.91.229.12 (18 Jun 2010 11:21:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 11:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 18 13:21:19 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPZdK-0007Sa-Dg for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:21:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45483 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPZdG-0007bs-LS for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:21:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47112 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPZd3-0007aI-7E for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:20:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPZd1-0001q4-B0 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:20:56 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:55500 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPZd1-0001UD-9K for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:20:55 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6938BBD01C; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:18:58 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Qo+KSRaI0fuDJmWHP5M2DCnpFsM=; b=cEGbn0 A2nU1rB9oz/6yWqZguV2edoh5J7+y6htCAba8IBaU2/HJArv0o0Ra6xnzdr9jtyB b7Ax1OsNTkDvRXZYQeCIQh5tmIZK/xOC/5TKf1phKaNYOfcfJOLvCLX3gDSHn9hL U8nuFfpdl3ziLG+a8PFycO/cog7M400Yf2U2k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=aXhnAnl4Uhp7dfPJmhEbGkehNs1auB+s KVkhJYIrfADoynqYpMAe+wEIJZxfrK7VnRos3abCYjiF+WDUQ4GntrYkqNGvnU/Q giXty/s413j9aa8/FlpiqqvK17hTYBOo/HhGy7gxP8mBOvDH2/2rR4K8ePml8Bdh ODKH/ysrx0k= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54871BD01B; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:18:57 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [79.151.219.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5624BD01A; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:18:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <874oh1g0sb.fsf@ambire.localdomain> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:02:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 496C5F64-7ACB-11DF-B60E-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10511 Archived-At: On Thu 17 Jun 2010 17:02, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > aka ee2a435c4c5b4dbbbac2006855afecaa23d9585a > aka ttn/misc-maint~2 (at the moment) > > The priciple behind this change is: less is more. > > OK to push into master? Would you mind sending patches using git-format-patch? It's easier to reply inline that way :-) I don't really understand this patch, or the current makefile foo thb, and would appreciate an explanation. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/