From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Can `make tags' generate tags for Scheme source, as well as C? Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:36:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87d3skxjd6.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87ocbzf4xn.fsf@gnu.org> <87pqvphb4d.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87r5g5h99i.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> <87lj64pfto.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <877hhoe5an.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286876011 24515 80.91.229.12 (12 Oct 2010 09:33:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org, Neil Jerram To: "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 12 11:33:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5bEd-00016F-Ur for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 11:33:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60477 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5bEd-0007XP-40 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:33:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40819 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5bEQ-0007XG-MC for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:33:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5bEP-0001Fa-FT for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:33:14 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:62573 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5bEP-0001FK-B9; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:33:13 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF217DD967; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:33:12 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=llCXamraOAXMEy18+BMZnjkFQJA=; b=jIQhHN Ec6V4TEn7xzwlStEf0Xu8qsw76YlRq10ZMcZfSVtDFRGN1fN67pKuiSkXeSZHX61 6NtOJ4ZSS89euQA6FnY1ZlJ7Ufdx7ag6Bi3so7GIEevoXyTWWHYYPAbDuDfNqEQr Xmf7dY3CoAUeGgnPYfBdfxIoq36qIiwLEgxQw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ujUm4LEd/sq9QW0irz26MSO46xNT2LNo Ih2BkWnSRmEbktP7iZiDzBpQY4zCggt4cODh3Ntd6PJQxu7EU4EiGGGCSDQdPom2 M7ojC4gYBiUOHpempeuutmS3EdR3AkjeRvPh3YiJMy5cPg6HXhBMyg5qnrJA0RyF G+WEPU1Y1L4= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF4FDD966; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:33:10 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [79.151.216.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1FFDDD965; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:33:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <877hhoe5an.fsf@newton.homeunix.net> (Jose A. Ortega Ruiz's message of "Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:24:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BA67E81E-D5E3-11DF-BE9B-030CEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11034 Archived-At: On Tue 12 Oct 2010 00:24, "Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" writes: > On Tue, Oct 12 2010, Andy Wingo wrote: > > [...] > >>> I'm sorry, I think I was being a bit stupid - expecting that it would >>> work even before starting a REPL. >> >> Is this a bad expectation? It is the first impression. > > Expecting anything to work in Geiser before starting (or connecting to) > a REPL is a bad expectation, yes :) Could it ask to start a new Guile or connect to a Guile? > I don't think it's a good a idea to load modules behind the user's > back. Could it ask? :-) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/