From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 16:42:12 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87d3qvo5i4.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87mxpzqo4w.fsf@gnu.org> <87tyk7xl8r.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290267509 6496 80.91.229.12 (20 Nov 2010 15:38:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 20 16:38:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJpWA-0000ji-HN for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 16:38:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38129 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJpW9-0002aa-QS for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:38:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37556 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJpW3-0002aT-6u for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:38:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJpW2-0008M1-4u for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:38:15 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:36290 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJpW2-0008Lx-2L; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:38:14 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B6E2725; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:38:25 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=wYtruHJ4qNHC GYaRSElXRovAmAI=; b=bnxG+Ngeo5rAh7aypT1e0gRxMEGfz7s0QRyKy81VBo5N jqYZ4MXYJfh/QuuSi1ENATHeTF7MDDzmtPVNPvXscIF+uJ83ymWfM8mHVIlaotXT OGhopYrzceUy0Jau4I+4mvf6QQMd7QcdwdWS8P98J6fD9owjCvjVZE9EqLexvwY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=PQnvLc 2kZv3FhiG6N0t3bk0RswlvWc+8FUY3OMGtHkPO20eLaObbhKXv+BusZa0ErUnn9m axADrix4FUrCWhoREzIIlTXBQKFW9J+r959CRqveS5qBwibOVdBnfOFkzNk3bkfD NXm2bZzjNRHQmc12Pex04xeEkFK3iwpVaouOo= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A762724; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:38:23 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [88.0.167.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1A012723; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:38:20 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87tyk7xl8r.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:35:16 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 35B2FC42-F4BC-11DF-85F1-B53272ABC92C-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11160 Archived-At: On Thu 28 Oct 2010 01:35, Neil Jerram writes: > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > >> Besides, you might want to check if it=E2=80=99s fixed in the elisp bran= ch, who >> knows. :-) > > Ah, yes, I didn't think of that. As luck would have it, this has indeed > been fixed already. :-) And Brian's paperwork has finally come through, so we can merge it now, after a review. I have been totally negligent regarding getting the fine SoC work in. I hope to get to that in the coming week. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/