From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: release update Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:00:42 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86iqitw915.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1245498503 14872 80.91.229.12 (20 Jun 2009 11:48:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:48:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 20 13:48:19 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MHz3T-0007qU-I6 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:48:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45888 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHz3S-0000xv-SR for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:48:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHz3Q-0000xg-9k for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:48:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHz3K-0000uZ-EE for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:48:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44951 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHz3K-0000uP-97 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:51407 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MHz3H-0000Kk-Ap; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D7921142; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:48:06 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [82.123.244.190]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F18821141; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:48:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <86iqitw915.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:01:58 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 37DADB26-5D90-11DE-A1D7-B5D1A546830D-02397024!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8731 Archived-At: On Thu 18 Jun 2009 23:01, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> guile-config and pkg-config > > We should deprecate the former, BTW, if this hasn't already been done. Indeed, though we need to keep it working through 2.0, at least until new guile.m4 (yet to be ported...) becomes common. >> (system xref), procedure-callers, procedure-callees, can work as >> variables get redefined > > I think this should be added to the manual as well. Yes. >> BUG: SCM_SNAME -> SCM_SUBR_NAME > > Ooh, I didn't worry much about it back then. Should we? I fixed this one. SNAME was very confusing to me :) >> FIXME: update copyrights > > Yes. > > (There's "(add-hook 'write-file-hooks 'copyright-update)", which I find > convenient.) Looks like Neil took care of things. I've added this one to my .emacs. >> ecmascript support? > > Yes, although it's currently undocumented. Indeed, needs fixing. >> new function: scm_module_public_interface > > Speaking of which, I was thinking at some point about adding a > `public-interface' slot to `module-type', to avoid hash table lookups. > What do you think? Yes! %module-public-interface is a terrible hack. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/