From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: %module-public-interface Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:02:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ir7nxzje.fsf@pobox.com> <87tzr7fnjg.fsf@chbouib.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269982913 1974 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2010 21:01:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:01:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 30 23:01:49 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwiZI-00019c-IC for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:01:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35293 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwiZI-0001K9-1P for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:01:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NwiYQ-0000vC-AQ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:00:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59428 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwiYO-0000uZ-Ul for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:00:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwiYM-0007yR-J2 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:00:52 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:50745 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwiYM-0007yM-Dt; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:00:50 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8126CA6435; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:00:49 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Gywez81dxi7L LXchLs8joZoVbhA=; b=Vcj+meeKbEogsu2OtAXnYZOCWcBJwtkIuPUHBiMxOKrC lA6H6Eg1T1NWK/vihO1JwHjPBZ04t7zwh8w5cT1H3R5SLjmkGGMXx/WQBWyqDkge dLvlxLeySL0pxqEjjRBGiJUO5H0+nA2qs2vfTjwULaFQn/xoQ7EFgtdJc+V+Oow= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=hLyncw EIn1fy4hfWhfebYSMKrpNdsQwAqqmO2jhAAqwlAHQE7ErX2FfSxBjJp0kxsHBGFm gadbYZG+jFJpSeNYyOXFSmOInc7Mj/MQZv86ZWGEZe7FRzBL0cDpyr0IWQ9AnIDc O6I7QLQU/n15hWk+t3SzaOHZWg2XtKoqHdjPU= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED12A6434; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:00:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [81.39.160.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADE8AA6433; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:00:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87tzr7fnjg.fsf@chbouib.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= =?utf-8?Q?=22's?= message of "Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:54:11 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 50FF585A-3C3F-11DF-9DEC-D033EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10123 Archived-At: FWIW, amusingly threaded against a mail I sent 2.5 years ago: On Fri 10 Aug 2007 16:54, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Hey! > > Andy Wingo writes: > >> Currently the public interface of a module is bound to a symbol in the >> module, %module-public-interface. This is a bit silly, as modules are >> record types anyway; why not just add another field in the module struct >> for this kind of metadata? Suggest doing so in 1.9. > > Agreed. > > Thanks, > Ludovic. :) --=20 http://wingolog.org/