From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix struct ip_mreq detection Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:52:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287514162 30622 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2010 18:49:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Tristan Colgate Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 19 20:49:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P8HFP-0005Pw-Qg for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 20:49:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39270 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8HFP-0005mz-DT for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:49:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48668 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8HFD-0005do-4k for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:49:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8HFB-0006jl-UP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:49:06 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:59901 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P8HFB-0006jg-Rx for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:49:05 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C9EE06D2; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:49:05 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=fulqIneTq6jz2yz6RtwB7HtcLtg=; b=Q+6IgP huL/mAZNX2GLFTmzj7bK8P8L8R0MxoFnm3Ii0aeJF1GRaC7BxNbJKy+fq2itADv6 ilJBsV5m9oktsyrbW2Pfwi04a085OSh65hTMGon17gXn4b6Hm1jhw4376Fw2zFdg pSMOr/E0hc/pQ3Y1XH1F4FAeLB2NU3vA8sdho= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=uEYI9VZl7GqIWYbhmS6N3L8qk74bwTAc RdH3DSqE+rI+mzNzNDWz2tMlUbXYhQ07bZDgPzxKijEoFK9HkRKmgc0MgeFZ+Djt vfS19kbI1k+hfWZxFuczmnJMx2wedazUMUoYJ5P8hqRfLRmRrE0ZW9+Sys6mLKxE XwfRK/Ge1DI= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C15E06D0; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:49:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [79.151.127.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67ADFE06CF; Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:49:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Tristan Colgate's message of "Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:31:18 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8B749D1C-DBB1-11DF-B8EF-030CEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11060 Archived-At: Hi Tristan, Under what conditions did this work or not work before? Can you resubmit this patch and the next one with the commit log looking like other commit logs in Guile? When you do, please attach the output of git-format-patch instead of sending it as-is; for some reason piping your message to git-am added your sig to the commit log. If you plan on making bigger patches in the future, it's probably a good idea to get paperwork going with the FSF. If this is the case, reply privately and I will send you details. Thanks for the patches, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/