From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Extension search path changed in 1.9 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:33:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87d3pv3gjr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297438135 4488 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2011 15:28:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 15:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 11 16:28:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PnuvN-0002Ih-Fd for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:28:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58541 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnuvN-00085Z-2i for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:28:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58763 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PnuvJ-00085P-RT for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:28:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnuvI-00076q-Lp for guile-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:28:41 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:63609 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PnuvI-00076j-DZ; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:28:40 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7C13412; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:29:41 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Kim15pwxsHTQ XyfsPDUHskLraFU=; b=B6PjH3QF5ABiMw2WMi35/gPa9Kf7Q65lBWHxXkaTgeD/ TrUsptjY+wdyBTk2G/K4WIB326NAEAmCNauFF8IkM/dNu6MiXYINNqyNLGT391Ym /MneWo1NMNaDJgV9fryEV66j1ZdAs/aBNA9RaztP18f9vz8MPlkNO77fW+1Wu5w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Dw+q8g pMasgahVjUkGc1/KdjY7sUJ9snU39X4eB6DUeh1drpB3XtBI9OtC/o6RNvJlbmuV 8ThhG9a6/wGvoZhx9aQltJxI/o1CLzIf7mIGtzhnvLl2XLqsNM2P/i4Lyn5Sksdk a7oPkV5ezq1zkFJkOFQNB/t1PpRV6Wuk+yBgw= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD67340E; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:29:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50C2F3404; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:29:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87d3pv3gjr.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:56:24 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BE4FAABE-35F3-11E0-93D0-AF401E47CF6F-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11556 Archived-At: Hi Ludovic, On Tue 23 Nov 2010 21:56, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > In 1.8, to run the test suite of libguile-foo from its build tree, I > typically had a =E2=80=98pre-inst-guile=E2=80=99 like this: > > exec @abs_top_builddir@/libtool --mode=3Dexecute \ > -dlopen "@abs_top_builddir@/src/libguile-foo.la" \ > @GUILE@ "$@" > > which amounts to =E2=80=9CLD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D$PWD/src/.libs:$LD_LIBRARY_PA= TH=E2=80=9D on > GNU/Linux. > > However, this no longer works with 2.0: if libguile-foo.so is already > present in SCM_EXTENSIONS_DIR, then it will be loaded instead of the one > from the build tree. This sounds like a bad change. Should we append to the LTDL_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable instead? I guess that's what we need to do with the libtools that are "out there". WDYT? Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/