unofficial mirror of guile-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Compiled load path issues
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:16:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m363abqjmr.fsf@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871vl090k6.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic Courtès"'s message of "Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:36:09 +0200")

On Sun 18 Oct 2009 17:36, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Once upon a time, if ‘chbouib.go’ is in the vicinity of ‘chbouib.scm’,
> then ‘(use-modules (chbouib))’ would load ‘chbouib.go’.  This is no
> longer the case, but can be remedied with something like this:
>
> diff --git a/libguile/load.c b/libguile/load.c
> index 50af256..194d1e5 100644
> --- a/libguile/load.c
> +++ b/libguile/load.c
> @@ -726,7 +726,9 @@ SCM_DEFINE (scm_primitive_load_path, "primitive-load-path", 0, 0, 1,
>      exception_on_not_found = SCM_BOOL_T;
>  
>    full_filename = scm_sys_search_load_path (filename);
> -  compiled_filename = scm_search_path (*scm_loc_load_compiled_path,
> +  compiled_filename = scm_search_path (scm_append
> +				        (scm_list_2 (*scm_loc_load_compiled_path,
> +						     *scm_loc_load_path)),
>                                         filename,
>                                         *scm_loc_load_compiled_extensions,
>                                         SCM_BOOL_T);
>
> Andy: can you comment?  What was the idea behind
> ‘%load-compiled-path’?

The idea is that given that the compiled files are
architecture-dependent, that they should go in $libdir instead of
$datadir. We can add $libdir, but I don't think it's a good idea -- not
only for reasons of excessive stat, but because I don't think we should
be putting binaries in with installed source.

> Besides, ‘scm_search_path ()’ was changed incompatibly compared to 1.8
> in 22f4ee48822db5e30df3abf9a11b6066f2bab9d3.  I’m wary about such
> incompatibilities and would like it if we could (1) list them, and
> (2) avoid them unless we really really can’t think of any other way.  In
> this particular case, do you have an idea on how to avoid it?

I don't really know. I'm sure it could be worked around somehow, but
it's not very fun work.

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/




  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-19 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-18 15:36 Compiled load path issues Ludovic Courtès
2009-10-19 19:16 ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2009-10-20  8:27   ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-10-20 18:59     ` Andy Wingo
2009-10-21 16:22       ` Ludovic Courtès
2009-10-21 18:15         ` Andy Wingo
2009-10-21 16:45       ` Parallel installability, API stability Ludovic Courtès
2009-10-21 18:17         ` Andy Wingo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m363abqjmr.fsf@pobox.com \
    --to=wingo@pobox.com \
    --cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).