From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: srfe records in reworked match Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:48:51 +0200 Message-ID: References: <201004201514.18375.stefan.tampe@spray.se> <878w8hkxky.fsf@gnu.org> <87fx2n8yg8.fsf@gnu.org> <87mxwv63wz.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271944056 5275 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2010 13:47:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 13:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 22 15:47:34 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4wkf-0000xp-5h for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:47:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51620 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O4wke-0006tc-Ka for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:47:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O4wkb-0006sq-IJ for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:47:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58608 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O4wkV-0006rG-Dj for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:47:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4wkT-0007US-O5 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:47:23 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:36949 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O4wkT-0007UH-JZ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:47:21 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7705ACF70; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:47:20 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=t7p7dYbqD5Bx TV//QEO1+XXZfc8=; b=aE88IxiPlmogU0stPniwK6HkjlFqXNWgZ2aAzieO6Big hN3GJZNgEI4+nZ8w2JHqtTFBymCnyGzZs/5Tm1+QvLGsfK7D7j0K2M70MJ5/BpRY tV/4Wu5KGq/8565Fhlwr8fI96eCMNB3s+/uRmTGX/WvokG7X+964gghRTyEg/Fo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=CR9m6G sJugxToGhaKxn6+B7ujTGRJHUYaZYXoBcd8f6GZwdhKsq0DK/UrUaAgOqlpynlaA cCae4+FkDVkq0SgaoVqRw3SuKgEzoQR/MtcClpY+imdeIP2qQzCxmS8eiauLFD8W H7HyIX9RrMUOYth1PgpqP8wwKtDG1I+qzfHjY= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3EEACF6F; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:47:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [83.202.100.241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46CF4ACF6A; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:47:17 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87mxwv63wz.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:57:16 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 91B2B5F8-4E15-11DF-9937-D033EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10292 Archived-At: On Thu 22 Apr 2010 14:57, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> This does not affect SRFI-9 accessors at all; they can still be >> integrable. > > Not unless =E2=80=98record-accessor=E2=80=99 is bypassed. I'm not talking about implementing srfi-9 record accessors in terms of guile record accessors. I'm talking about having the vtable be a record type. Accessors can still be integrated. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/