From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Scheme Implementers Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:01:16 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87bp2za0tr.fsf@gnu.org> <4932388F-7850-4937-B424-B4EA68AF5278@telia.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296391042 7204 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2011 12:37:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , guile-devel@gnu.org To: Hans Aberg Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 30 13:37:18 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PjWWr-0008P7-Dv for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:37:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60432 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PjWWq-0002iG-N4 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50074 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PjWWc-0002h1-Vb for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PjWWb-0002YI-9p for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:02 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:56709 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PjWWb-0002YE-7t; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:01 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C692332C3; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:52 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=asouHdfFXyna iEkuBEeKxuO8Lr0=; b=vqdw2t8aWViiBBUEC1eBgge6LzbshZU19BwTYJDcX+Hi GC8M2CVu/7qwUc+iD+sWBjes06Iv3+cuOccsTn+Or5ka26l7cpK2No4x7WkrnLBE RZov7VShXRZTxtW1nFQ+wZS9XjshrpzdbEzNuRrrGqdsgSk58TxNhRZEkrj+7J8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=rlyqQT X2RUymnCz6x9YAChHCq1G7qukrXmSq31qqc1GZUeano9gNBwocxfxxZ1CemGsasB yUMAMYgnZCdMSmgEarHtD2+6MqM497r27Ey1dVV38tfkXLk9gScw75OaHx5/P3sW kxGRRirmiv8NkCn06QwkdnyCVDHlWw2b81gIU= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A252532B1; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:50 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D11ED32AC; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 07:37:47 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4932388F-7850-4937-B424-B4EA68AF5278@telia.com> (Hans Aberg's message of "Sat, 29 Jan 2011 23:54:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C00CA058-2C6D-11E0-961E-BC4EF3E828EC-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11421 Archived-At: On Sat 29 Jan 2011 23:54, Hans Aberg writes: > On 29 Jan 2011, at 21:53, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >>> I think there should be a mailing list for people who implement >>> Schemes, to sort of coordinate our non-standard features. ... > >> I think comp.lang.scheme is already a good place for this. You >> quickly >> get feedback and many implementors seem to participate in it. > > The newsgroup did not seem very active. Is it still important? There are also lists related to standardization: r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org, and scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org. There are SRFI lists as well, I think. The scheme-reports list seems to always end up in my spam box for some reason, though. I think I tried like three times to subscribe to it, but never got the confirmation mails, becaus of some problem with that list. Still I think it is the most active list on the standardization front. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/