From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: heads up: goops class export Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 15:11:00 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87r58gp3q2.fsf@gnu.org> <87sjswnfhc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304428277 26501 80.91.229.12 (3 May 2011 13:11:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 13:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 03 15:11:12 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QHFNg-0004PU-MU for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 15:11:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55449 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHFNg-00073Q-4c for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 09:11:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:45968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHFNd-00073A-PH for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 09:11:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHFNc-0002Dj-Ii for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2011 09:11:09 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:50050 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QHFNc-0002DO-GC; Tue, 03 May 2011 09:11:08 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054FF2116; Tue, 3 May 2011 09:13:11 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=sYxsPcyz4pUR X35l8EEP/F+aVPY=; b=o9i6sO9xFbG7S0HKFV0nA1FLGQCm8fC+PNVCsruwH37C 90wsm2ZML1Sic6BqXLoiR4OnZPAyc9d0s6UpO5aE8mCcSHq357XQFaFxrrRLNsYx 51DvT3bxyTgD8AGcmm5MVk1fF6ppjYMW+lZ84/aGsVgEWAwyWHnrmBBS38ajUHI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=QsW15s 7/ljXLC15HwbrlnqQRbf2TlK739n171e82gbwxu3b/qUzGVVtxGyS4w+JAiC3j/q XjbGPtjhAAGnhogqjmiJ4zFomTNGs8C7zwQovdLx5j2+8cfyIb/QuaPMqjq49yLT Vr0z0RDdKou8UXhN0X6MJVa0jcJuatmYkE0KY= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E882115; Tue, 3 May 2011 09:13:08 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 213512114; Tue, 3 May 2011 09:13:06 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87sjswnfhc.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Tue, 03 May 2011 14:19:43 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 17090B14-7587-11E0-A894-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12419 Archived-At: Hi :) On Tue 03 May 2011 14:19, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> smob-name->class > > Yes, why not. (It=E2=80=99s equivalent to (@@ (oop goops) foobar) in ter= ms of > providing access to everyone, though.) OK. GOOPS really isn't for the ocap folks, given class-direct-subclasses, the cross-module implications of defining a new method on a generic, etc :) Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/