From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Around again, and docs lead role Date: 13 May 2003 20:56:58 +0100 Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <86r874ru3i.fsf@520000401788.dialin.t-online.de> <86znlr9bn5.fsf@520000401788.dialin.t-online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1052856791 28889 80.91.224.249 (13 May 2003 20:13:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 20:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Development Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 13 22:13:08 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19Fg7m-0007Of-00 for ; Tue, 13 May 2003 22:11:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Fg1J-0006zZ-04 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 May 2003 16:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Fg0y-0006xN-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2003 16:04:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19Fg0x-0006wj-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2003 16:04:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.21] helo=s1.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19FfwH-0005fn-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 May 2003 15:59:53 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns.ossau.uklinux.net (bts-0094.dialup.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.48.94]) by s1.uklinux.net (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4DJxn826821; Tue, 13 May 2003 20:59:49 +0100 Original-Received: from laruns.ossau.uklinux.net.ossau.uklinux.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id D6D7ADC4D3; Tue, 13 May 2003 20:56:58 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Max Techter In-Reply-To: <86znlr9bn5.fsf@520000401788.dialin.t-online.de> Original-Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2355 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:2355 >>>>> "Max" == Max Techter writes: Max> Take your time, Neil. I will be engaged in "my Max> guile analysis" for quite some time. Max> And there is no chance for me coming up with first Max> well formed proposals before, say the end of this Max> month, although I`ll try to supply my comments sooner. OK - thanks. Max> On which version exactly should I build? Max> I produced my printout and info files from: Max> Is this OK, or should I switch to a source Max> from CVS? CVS would be better: CVS is where ongoing work should be applied to, and it will be easier to do this if your patches are against CVS. Max> Taking the fun of playing the harsh critic, Max> I would feel obliged to propose better ways, Max> naturally. I look forward to them. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel