* what do to if there is no %nil
@ 2010-01-18 14:23 Mike Gran
2010-01-18 14:50 ` Andy Wingo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Gran @ 2010-01-18 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-devel
Hi-
I tried building master with the --disable-elisp configure option.
When that option is enabled, libguile no longer contains the %nil value.
The assembler expects %nil to always exist.
I made a quick and dirty modification in
7beae9f15ac49f144a15d3ebfe80c2f29e43b3ff just to get it to build; but,
I'm sure that a prettier solution should implemented.
Thanks,
-Mike
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: what do to if there is no %nil
2010-01-18 14:23 what do to if there is no %nil Mike Gran
@ 2010-01-18 14:50 ` Andy Wingo
2010-01-18 20:23 ` Neil Jerram
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andy Wingo @ 2010-01-18 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Gran; +Cc: guile-devel
On Mon 18 Jan 2010 15:23, Mike Gran <spk121@yahoo.com> writes:
> I tried building master with the --disable-elisp configure option.
> When that option is enabled, libguile no longer contains the %nil value.
> The assembler expects %nil to always exist.
>
> I made a quick and dirty modification in
> 7beae9f15ac49f144a15d3ebfe80c2f29e43b3ff just to get it to build; but,
> I'm sure that a prettier solution should implemented.
I saw that patch, and it looked fine to me. I'd also be fine with just
always building with %nil support (because that's basically all that
--enable-elisp does, right?), but maybe that's just me...
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: what do to if there is no %nil
2010-01-18 14:50 ` Andy Wingo
@ 2010-01-18 20:23 ` Neil Jerram
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Neil Jerram @ 2010-01-18 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Wingo; +Cc: guile-devel
Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> writes:
> On Mon 18 Jan 2010 15:23, Mike Gran <spk121@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> I tried building master with the --disable-elisp configure option.
>> When that option is enabled, libguile no longer contains the %nil value.
>> The assembler expects %nil to always exist.
>>
>> I made a quick and dirty modification in
>> 7beae9f15ac49f144a15d3ebfe80c2f29e43b3ff just to get it to build; but,
>> I'm sure that a prettier solution should implemented.
>
> I saw that patch, and it looked fine to me. I'd also be fine with just
> always building with %nil support (because that's basically all that
> --enable-elisp does, right?), but maybe that's just me...
Yes, I agree. There are a couple of details in the reader that depend
on SCM_ENABLE_ELISP, that someone should check out. Subject to
those being OK, I think we could remove the --disable-elisp option.
Neil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-18 20:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-18 14:23 what do to if there is no %nil Mike Gran
2010-01-18 14:50 ` Andy Wingo
2010-01-18 20:23 ` Neil Jerram
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).