From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: heads up: rename from (rnrs bytevector) to (rnrs bytevectors) Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 21:50:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87typmhmwf.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275462560 24686 80.91.229.12 (2 Jun 2010 07:09:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 07:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 02 09:09:19 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJi4k-0007wO-Rh for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 09:09:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49717 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OJi4j-0007kG-T3 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:09:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36739 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OJi4d-0007hq-9G for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:09:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJi4Z-0001NO-5h for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:09:11 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:40979 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJi4Z-0001NK-3y; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 03:09:07 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F66DB8F4A; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:09:07 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=yCWSpoywJ/zf XmAPa5b8pm6rqSE=; b=AVWmxrPoyNLbJwAakiDBhayIXVx1WyxKvRtDRSmZqt/7 UiSlkafSMJG7jd/3MwYX+dKlJda/NkkUf/9A8xwV9Fzbv4e6MSMKQGzrMgjjmqvY rgCv1ulYqra6dEckjzmzhkSyQ9sYo6pw7/3Iiw1tjPMPp/0EsvtCiTF9sxtgp10= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=b9Z5yv oYHEcUt3WOEf1iUGLq4k8V9qZu/o0VoE5aoVc4s7M8hcDNqoLeX3R3yWQNyL5LDJ aL6L0mdob/PnyvZ6s9XenVcNJ1Qh/piMWQ/uQJPFecqz9gGnadWuX0ZdutRNsciN Y9Tr89L3OSmEyrv5NeTS5947RLnXrAKmepmG0= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED844B8F49; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:09:05 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [80.24.4.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CD48B8F48; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:09:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87typmhmwf.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:01:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BB4156DE-6E15-11DF-9C17-6730EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10419 Archived-At: On Tue 01 Jun 2010 16:01, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > That=E2=80=99s fine with me, though I wouldn=E2=80=99t want to change it = when the new > RnRS bytevector API du jour comes out [0]. Yeah. I really don't know why they are bothering about this at all. The blob API has no advantages that I can see, besides the shorter name. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/