From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GSOC PEG project Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:19:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279369018 13626 80.91.229.12 (17 Jul 2010 12:16:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Lucy Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 17 14:16:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oa6K6-0008WQ-MS for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:16:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37165 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oa6K6-0003Xd-2n for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:16:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34677 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oa6Jz-0003XO-0o for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:16:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oa6Jy-0003Fp-0A for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:16:46 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:35932 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oa6Jx-0003Fi-Ud for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:16:45 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBA2C596F; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:16:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=9m5ktiGmxr6lDXRn+wtgpGGRvzA=; b=SZiZ9L eCzMFmTBnpFmNMwmuAFb9Tu8aqKW0VHEWMNGmJIi2T5R0fB4Dhav0f9gI+BU86Xf sUvcWS2VbOHC+csOvSD26V3XDwLWzZxgz5LdJomJJ8JFpdIO8H2IzGY/I/uUqqOs /rYkI+JeFzR6sf4FnwWGiADIN39Jz14ZVJi2c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=c/81AZ0UUIH1jaPFGsnd/T6z1D4OE6eu 0lT5lkq7BGw7CuqwucLfJ6tfvEDKZZk7s1dKAoAjaXi76JXZbsJdnjWfUxua0/g9 svjepZbg+txbdTk3crul0K5DMCC/2VpD5jeN5q/qr2hF6Rs3sxt3XTv/uIzg7s35 ZU/RqDlrQi0= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A1BC596D; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:16:43 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [81.38.186.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43312C596C; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:16:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Michael Lucy's message of "Fri, 9 Jul 2010 02:58:05 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 292A1B54-919D-11DF-B51C-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10679 Archived-At: Heya, Sorry for the delayed reply again! I am trying to drain my email swamp, but there is a sucking sound there... On Fri 09 Jul 2010 09:58, Michael Lucy writes: >> You should change it to be implemented with syntax-case. Please let >> me know if you need help. > > Sorry I didn't do it this way in the first place. No need to apologize! Hacking Scheme is a journey and we all come from different places. > wrapping my entire file in an (eval-when (compile load eval) ...) > form. Is this one of those fixes that's going to haunt me down the > line? No, it will be easy to fix, should the problem remain after your syntax-case foo. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/