From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: SRFI-1 in Scheme Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:11:27 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8739vocnr0.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbk3uj8c.fsf@gnu.org> <87sk3nt326.fsf@gnu.org> <87iq4gfmp8.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4oqru11.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279656538 13893 80.91.229.12 (20 Jul 2010 20:08:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 20 22:08:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObJ7W-0002P9-0I for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:08:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51944 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ObJ7V-0000H0-EH for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:08:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36776 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ObJ7M-0000Gq-Ra for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:08:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObJ7L-0006oB-NH for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:08:44 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:40057 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ObJ7L-0006o6-K6; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:08:43 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68123C6060; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:08:43 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=EXmndgY1jkeb JccPd2ZrU8CfEgQ=; b=jnoN4HfdXOlR8WEqJ7PCIuBN5C/rkY90CFSBjrn+VMCR O3+JRqfT0NxWKotI6GvkRiPP+ejMIB7BScHXlxLRnxzWWji6Nuv8GlXTyVeTJbM2 pLWaNxwnvo1EgJM4LcWNULFsjI/dMDUxxxWw9Qb7ozF0NORyOlY4XjZuRise8yE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=iAou/q qOp+Wq6nF+dhWTLr2Z64so4/iNCpJZewm+/b+LviEj8Wo+vmEE6ujbAqT9yih44U sm0WFigXyTiGsr6bkODrtAcsG1XH5AMqq1vFUoA0+6+2OUaujZZz3uVtYLH0mMmW y3hoNhne3BASnx3am4UKNdB5T6tyWTmp7IqW8= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F4DC605F; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:08:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [81.39.161.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56EA4C6056; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:08:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87k4oqru11.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:35:06 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 97E87262-943A-11DF-B555-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10707 Archived-At: Yo, On Tue 20 Jul 2010 18:35, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> I would prefer not to enshrine a "regular / debug" split again though. I >> guess that's what really bothers me. It's especially egregious if you >> can't switch at runtime. > > The split survived! :-) > > $ guile -c 'sdf' > ERROR: In procedure catch-closure: > ERROR: Unbound variable: sdf > > $ guile --debug -c 'sdf' > Backtrace: [...] Hehe. That, to me, is a bug ;-) What do you think about always giving backtraces for uncaught errors? This does not impact regular vs debug VMs, as thankfully we can walk any stack now. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/