From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Problems with guile-sqlite3 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:54:37 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87fwq31i0u.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301583275 13996 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2011 14:54:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 31 16:54:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5JGV-0006UT-Pw for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:54:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50545 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5JGV-0005FT-9c for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:54:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36117 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5JGS-0005F4-43 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:54:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5JGQ-00014b-QM for guile-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:54:23 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:45581 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5JGQ-00014I-Nk; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:54:22 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682A83001; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:56:11 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=QBZxljgLw7zt 8BoZXJfBGsSdQTs=; b=rp3lAZEvPV6zHmhp1jhvRi6pMxqgFRqHV/V8+UYPJN69 PEJ7XxP8GpUgw2wBkaExLj6EDVjnNtLKTTbChbaVR2w8IpQ6QEaZPidjeB3ko/Kh 8sJMbn6zeFa2OMp+UKjPMyJaGmi4L+GeOEMWo9C3XLQsg69cR6MgFWlBPX75drY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=VAYTL6 UAicxxSJBt3kdzUtYcTK5mY6e0/1EsuA30dBVLgTXbr4GYwDS4DvVDjdeMeFbDou tXXyw3Ntrbc7FyOA6nnOCtlNh1fpXFpvOeYyL7j7HRHjtD69/Pla535v2e1U7Fca EGOMVBNAvu/O8xYjeGB7371U/cXjGW8YfvfTI= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551E44FFE; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:56:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B94C94FFC; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 10:56:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87fwq31i0u.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:28:17 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 03356780-5BA7-11E0-B364-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12120 Archived-At: Hi :) On Thu 31 Mar 2011 16:28, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> It seems that the string->pointer code is doing the wrong thing: > > It works as advertised. :-) Sorry, I didn't mean to accuse that function, as I didn't even use it! (define (string->utf8-pointer s) (bytevector->pointer (string->utf8 s))) That said, adding an #:encoding argument to string->pointer and pointer->string sounds like a good idea. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/