Re: Queries about while doc and (ice-9 command-line)

[Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>]

Hi Neil,

Thanks for the review!

On Thu 28 Apr 2011 20:12, Neil Jerram <neil@ossau.uklinux.net> writes:

> +@example
> +(while #f (error "not reached")) @result{} #f
> +(while #t (break)) @result{} #t
> +(while #f (break 1 2 3)) @result{} 1 2 3
> +@end example
>
> I think the #f in the last while line should be #t.

Indeed, fixed.

>             (if (pair? do-script)
>                 (set-car! do-script arg))
>             (set! arg0 arg)
>             (set! interactive? #f)
>             (finish args
>                     (cons `(load ,arg) out)))
>
> Does this code mean that we load the script twice, in the -ds case?

I think so, yes; unfortunately.  Fixed.  Would this merit a quick 2.0.2,
you think?

>
> If that's right, I believe the -s block has the same issue.
>
>            ((string=? arg "-x")         ; add to %load-extensions
>             (if (null? args)
>                 (error "missing argument to `-L' switch"))
>             (set! user-extensions (cons (car args) user-extensions))
>             (parse (cdr args)
>                    out))
>
> In the error message here, -L should be -x.

Fixed also.

> Do we go interactive after seeing a -e option?  I don't see a setting of
> the interactive? variable that would prevent this?

This appears to be the old behavior.  Am I mistaken?

Thanks,

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/