From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Build problem & unrelated patch Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:44:55 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87typfnbad.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275864542 5727 80.91.229.12 (6 Jun 2010 22:49:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 22:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 07 00:49:00 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLOeJ-0004Mm-Q2 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:49:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44148 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OLOeJ-0005jb-5J for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:48:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44812 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OLOeC-0005il-AD for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:48:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLOeB-0008B3-0G for guile-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:48:52 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:63170 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OLOeA-0008Ay-UC; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:48:50 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88668B8F2E; Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:48:50 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=3KNcsX5ugICm Yw25FIewvYzBceY=; b=PcXgK65ZFu4g9d+DAJ43TQko3FtjhGpe2ZGcfDUqfmzX 2O0d6MWrR4c28u2XZA/5Smixd0Ab2NBOmhFRQwNIcuOPTdcdsMS2Ck0Zls7jKLSO Nn8zp1Iv9Oti7ea5I8k2wH7J78CnirfOfY0J7n7VRIibGIJnpTMuFgFRca7MZcU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=mHzur3 ssmvoumUO7zmBBogfuTvrDihZNKp8SfB+LBUODHh6f6R/+piwgw96zSUwrEwm+u+ /wHraQ8zBMWDgP4nMECYtVU5xIQhgh9rgI51IJ0FCbuRq7UtNZ7VKvCNEqt7vJkW tPDtbYKfuFWAhlZlsf6839nG1vNeXA1r/aHQU= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734BCB8F2D; Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:48:49 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [83.44.188.237]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D40DBB8F2C; Sun, 6 Jun 2010 18:48:47 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87typfnbad.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Sun, 06 Jun 2010 22:42:02 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AC1804FE-71BD-11DF-A336-6730EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10450 Archived-At: On Sun 06 Jun 2010 22:42, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > No Itisnt writes: > >> Recently I get a build failure on libguile/guile-procedures.texi: >> >> guile: uncaught throw to misc-error: (dynamic-link file: ~S, message: >> ~S (libguile-srfi-srfi-1-v-4 file not found) #f) > > Actually it=E2=80=99s what=E2=80=99s been causing build failures on Hydra= for the last > few days. If you look at the first failed =E2=80=98tarball=E2=80=99 job = at > , it points to the changes at > . > > They seem harmless at first sight, but it=E2=80=99s probably an obscure r= eason > such as the fact that we=E2=80=99re suddenly loading srfi-1 earlier than = before > as a side effect of changes to the =E2=80=98use-modules=E2=80=99 clauses. Ew, well that would be me I think. Gross. I'll poke later, unless someone gets to it first. A --=20 http://wingolog.org/