From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Possible Documentation Fix Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:54:51 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296676452 16979 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2011 19:54:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 02 20:54:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PkimD-00054M-RZ for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 20:54:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58564 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PkimD-0008K4-6L for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:54:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60960 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pkii9-0005h9-51 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:49:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pkii7-0007OT-OP for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:49:52 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:49507 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pkii7-0007OP-Lw for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:49:51 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A823215; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:50:44 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=3+yJ8l6rlkkZ h/wFBPFQqjrjhU4=; b=SleH+wQGhR2C9/A0yuQVSL/s5JcaVqCZSFO7Za03Qmib 3oapHw4j3TlvtL3HbMK/K4DhiHeK3we/rX3Gj1wp4wfLCEtU9HBdGf38C68lwFdJ RyjvPFwb/mO8E3opPg9G5kFlVbaBz+pDzEzo4Adl1BwMbSwxIRguxQ70kn5QJbQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Y8Fj8l w+BZh1XPWhK06HR4/GsVGpCErRBRGY+kulk6R7UCL9OGU3udNy2SjDDElQaEl82R JMywMQhg7jLOL/o2tdHaXwq94XJBQlsAAm/joQqR9YVDufxu7W9WvzO1DoQDIuan Bg7CDb/f1BZ4lZ97966cbz8qHW5Nj4uKnI7rk= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BDA3210; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:50:43 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9B3B320E; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 14:50:41 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Noah Lavine's message of "Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:53:37 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B853C1D0-2F05-11E0-BF8C-F13235C70CBC-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:11514 Archived-At: On Wed 02 Feb 2011 15:53, Noah Lavine writes: >> Looks great to me! =C2=A0Would you mind submitting an updated patch? > > It's attached. Thanks. I added a summary line and committed it. I've added you to the Guile group. If you don't mind, please continue to post patches to the list for a little while. Try to rebase before pushing patches to the Guile repo; merge commits are OK sometimes, but we like having a nice linear history. I guess in short the thing is to keep up the excellent patch-quality that you already have! Happy hacking, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/