From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julian Graham Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: TODO for 2.0 Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:11:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271679104 25958 80.91.229.12 (19 Apr 2010 12:11:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:11:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 19 14:11:41 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3ppE-0005I4-JL for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:11:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37523 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O3ppD-0000Qy-Jz for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:11:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O3pp8-0000NN-EI for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:11:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60678 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O3pp5-0000Hz-QG for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:11:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3pp1-0001ZJ-7m for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:11:31 -0400 Original-Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com ([74.125.78.148]:41630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O3pp1-0001Z6-2S for guile-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 08:11:27 -0400 Original-Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so288400eyg.34 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:11:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+wnCMX96ZkgzpmGloCmtK7X4IzKTHUbd5pQH5CUsvuk=; b=b/NyXcn7bIMOdVqJso7iTkItGiz0+R4iYbgTSJbeQu9OBNBcn6sgDwF1C1t6m60FlJ FlcigR8YXWoD/bqs/z9rCQ0C2UujgvVHhNm+0VGmpP7PtwYPZaC1q9b4ybaHXvXHdxMf 7gaom2iyzBjJteVWQUSb4Ku/2EiclwvWJxlN0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=gf9MORouPUOkkVssnYcqF+oOvssZBUiDGmWbPJQ9Ae9XKplRxg0OzHStFifFqGY6QS AWbcLVcICE2134BjqcCia2Mf0c23GGe0UfyXp7tLn2r1pKqy6oazMXdsR6tAmz6O730M cx2tu1fVvA849JRrbLD9yG33LzXo9g9Qzi6m4= Original-Received: by 10.213.9.18 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:11:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Original-Received: by 10.213.49.212 with SMTP id w20mr2689162ebf.29.1271679086192; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 05:11:26 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:10259 Archived-At: Hi Andy, > I'll add this to my list, then. Is there no smaller test case than > compiling the entire wrapper module? Does this problem occur with > smaller libraries as well? I would love to have a simple test case that > I can run on master. I'll spelunk on your branch, though, if that's > necessary. Thanks! I've been trying to create a more discrete test case -- no luck as yet, but I'll let you know if I come up with one. Regards, Julian