From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Skarda <0rfelyus@ucw.cz> Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: What can I do to help? (conclusions) Date: 07 Oct 2002 23:08:38 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20021004132911.GD20754@www> <87k7ky5ggq.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> <20021006170804.GA7206@www> <87ofa71nfh.fsf@alice.rotty.yi.org> <87hefzjgng.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1034067779 16851 127.0.0.1 (8 Oct 2002 09:02:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Rottmann , guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17yqGX-0004Nf-00 for ; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 11:02:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17yqFp-0002JK-00; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 05:02:13 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17yqEx-0000xy-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 05:01:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17yqEi-0000jN-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 05:01:18 -0400 Original-Received: from stateless3.tiscali.cz ([213.235.135.72] helo=mail.tiscali.cz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17yqEh-0000j0-00 for guile-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2002 05:01:04 -0400 Original-Received: from hobitin.ucw.cz (212.11.98.61) by mail.tiscali.cz (6.0.044) id 3D76F54400135495; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:57:45 +0200 Original-Received: from 0rfelyus by hobitin.ucw.cz with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 17yf7G-0000CC-00; Mon, 07 Oct 2002 23:08:38 +0200 Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: <87hefzjgng.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1475 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:1475 > > No, you don't compile using C++, just use g++ for the linking > > stage. This way the executable will be linked against libstdc++, but > > there should be no other user-visible effects except that C++ modules > > will work. > > In my experience, you don't need to do that on GNU/Linux but you need > to on Solaris. Does that match your experience? > > In any case: do you have a patch? We might even link with g++ by > default when it is available. I guess that it would be sufficient to link C++ _modules_ with g++ (or link them explicitely with libstdc++). For example you do not have to link guile against libgtk to make guile-gtk modules work. But do not believe me, it is just a guess few minutes before midnight... I have never loaded C++ modules to C program. 0. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel