From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GC rewrite, first version. Date: 01 Aug 2002 10:46:21 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <15685.48166.358219.226421@blauw.xs4all.nl> <15688.9798.978583.867042@meddo.cs.uu.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028191599 24336 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2002 08:46:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dirk Herrmann , guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17aBbR-0006KP-00 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 10:46:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17aBbq-00029Q-00; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 04:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.163.1] helo=mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17aBbF-000292-00 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2002 04:46:26 -0400 Original-Received: from burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.19]) by mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E08A3831; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:46:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 520) id D784626249; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:46:22 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Han-Wen Nienhuys In-Reply-To: <15688.9798.978583.867042@meddo.cs.uu.nl> Original-Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:908 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:908 Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > To what extent are these naming standards decided (names.txt is dated > march, and I believe little has been done on the code since)? The definite list of naming conventions is the section "Naming Conventions" in the file HACKING. We probably need to distinguish between "must" conventions and "should" conventions there, tho. I.e. the scm_i_ convention must be followed, but scm_n_ only should. > If it is we have to wait for two releases (four years) before the > old names are scrapped, then I'm not going to waste energy on it. On what? Scrapping the old names or following the new convention? _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel