From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: scm_gc_calloc? Date: 05 Aug 2002 20:19:00 +0200 Sender: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <15693.18997.339956.870162@blauw.xs4all.nl> <877kj6zcy1.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1028571566 27884 127.0.0.1 (5 Aug 2002 18:19:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 18:19:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: hanwen@cs.uu.nl, guile-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17bmRx-0007Fc-00 for ; Mon, 05 Aug 2002 20:19:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17bmSc-0001yY-00; Mon, 05 Aug 2002 14:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: from krusty.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.163.1] helo=mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17bmSQ-0001xV-00 for ; Mon, 05 Aug 2002 14:19:54 -0400 Original-Received: from burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.19]) by mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402DEA3831; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 20:19:53 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 520) id 256462616B; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 20:19:00 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <877kj6zcy1.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Original-Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 Errors-To: guile-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:994 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:994 Rob Browning writes: > Han-Wen writes: > > > Why don't we have a scm_gc_calloc, that is, a function delivering > > cleared memory? That would make a lot of C init functions shorter, > > and it makes for more robust code. > > Sounds reasonable to me. Yep. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel