From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: About 'futures' Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:17:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87sm35yg2n.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110383100 5284 80.91.229.2 (9 Mar 2005 15:45:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:45:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Mikael Djurfeldt , guile-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 16:44:59 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D93JR-0001aB-4G for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:41:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D93Y7-0001t1-E3 for guile-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:56:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D93Xx-0001sh-4I for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:56:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D93Xv-0001rx-Cd for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:56:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D93XK-0001cn-TW for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:55:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [129.217.163.1] (helo=mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D92wK-0000t8-US for guile-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:17:37 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F5944025; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:17:36 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (krusty [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25565-03-2; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:17:35 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from troy.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (troy.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.163.17]) by mail.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A9544023; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:17:35 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by troy.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 520) id 8412FBBA1; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:17:35 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87sm35yg2n.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Tue, 08 Mar 2005 15:37:36 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de X-BeenThere: guile-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-devel-bounces+guile-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: guile-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4844 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.devel:4844 Rob Browning writes: > Though is a terminated thread very "heavy"? i.e. is it much heavier > than a cons pair? Yes. It is a scm_i_thread struct, but the OS thread has been deallocated already. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel